Brexit Timebomb if May Refuses to Accept Foreign Workers

Parliament with UK and EU flag

A study by an employer backed think-tank has revealed that unless Theresa May’s government accepts at least 200,000 foreign workers each year, the economy could face a Brexit catastrophe.

The Global Futures report, entitled, “A Case for immigration”, cited low productivity, an aging population and a shortage of key skilled workers, such as those needed in the NHS, meant that the country needed double the number of migrant workers than Mrs May wants to allow in.

The report, backed by three employer groups, criticises Labour and the Conservatives for refusing to be honest with the British public about the level of migration the UK requires. It warns that if the UK refuses to be flexible about its sources of talent, it could face a decade of slow growth similar to that of the Japanese economy.

The Conservative manifesto

The Conservative government’s manifesto, which was released earlier this week, has promised to slash immigration to below 100,000, even though this pledge, which has been on the table since 2009, has never been met.

One way the party plans to achieve their strategy is to increase the minimum income threshold for spouse visa applicants.  Mrs May has also vowed to charge companies £2,000 a year for every skilled non-EU migrant they employ.  Currently the immigration Skills Charge, which was only introduced last month, is set at £1,000.

The manifesto states:

"Skilled immigration should not be a way for government or business to avoid their obligations to improve the skills of the British workforce."

"So we will double the immigration Skills Charge levied on companies employing migrant workers, to £2,000 a year by the end of the parliament, using the revenue generated to invest in higher level skills training for workers in the UK."

Elderly population means more migrant workers needed

The Global Futures report has found that even if the retirement age is raised, the growing elderly population in the UK will require at least 130,000 to maintain the working population at its current level.

The report comments:

“Between 2000 and 2050, the number of people over 65 will double, whilst the number of over-85s will quadruple. The working population would need to double in order to maintain the ratio at its current level.”

It is clear from the Conservative manifesto that if they are re-elected back into power (which most polls are predicting), the rules on immigration will continue to be tightened, which may prove disastrous for the overall economy.

OTS Solicitors is regarded as one of the best immigration law firms in the UK.  If you need advice on any immigration law matters, please phone our office on 0203 959 9123 to talk to one of our dedicated immigration lawyers





Relevant People: 

For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS immigration solicitors on 0203 959 9123 or contact us online.


We are one of the UK’s top firms for immigration solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, Spouse Visas, Student Visas, Work Permit Visas, Indefinite Leave to Remain, EEA Applications, Asylum and Human Rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, Entrepreneur Visas and Investor Visas.

Our top immigration solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.


Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0203 959 9123.

By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.