Labour commits to abolish immigration detention centres as provisional figures show wrongful Windrush removals

During the initial disclosures made by the then Home Secretary Amber Rudd as the Windrush scandal broke, it was asserted that there was nothing to suggest that any members of the Windrush generation had been wrongly removed from the UK. Evidently, things have moved on, and the new Home Secretary, Sajid Javid, has reported provisional figures to the Home Affairs Select Committee suggesting that at least 63 people with the right to be in the UK as part of the Windrush generation may have been wrongly removed from the UK.

Investigations into 8,000 removals

The figures were revealed following investigations into 8,000 records of removals from the UK of people over the age of 45. Mr Javid has confirmed that he has instructed “…officials to be absolutely certain and thorough and check over every record and make sure." As one of the most highly recommended immigration law firms in London handling a number of claims by members of the Windrush generation, it comes as no surprise to hear that people have been wrongfully removed from the UK. We share Yvette Cooper’s concern that there remain “many unanswered questions” arising from this.

Labour commits to closing immigration detention centres

Following the disclosure by Mr Javid, shadow Home Secretary Diane Abbott has announced Labour’s commitment to close two of the most notorious immigration detention centres, Yarls Wood in Bedford, and Brook House in Croydon. 

Those who have no permission to remain in the UK and are unable to obtain immigration bail often find themselves in an immigration detention centre. Part of the hostile environment, a strategic policy designed to encourage people without permission to be in the UK to leave voluntarily, immigration detention centres offer little comfort to those who are forced to stay they, often for many months while departure arrangements are finalised. Brook House was recently in the news following a spike of violence lead to a dramatic increase in the use of force there.

The closures would be part of a package to stamp out the hostile environment policy that has been pursued by the Conservative government. The money the closures would generate would be put towards supporting victims of modern slavery, trafficking and domestic violence.

OTS Solicitors are recommended in the Legal 500 for immigration bail issues and immigration and human rights law generally. If you are affected by any issues faced by the Windrush generation, or would like to discuss your immigration status with one of the best Immigration Lawyers in London, call us on 0203 959 9123 to book your appointment today.



Relevant People: 

For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS Immigration Solicitors on 0203 959 9123 or contact us online.


We are one of the UK’s top firms for Immigration Solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, spouse visas, Student Visas, Work Permit Visas, Indefinite Leave to Remain, EEA Applications, Asylum and human rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, entrepreneur visas and Investor Visas.

Our top Immigration Solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.


Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0203 959 9123.

By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.