British national Toni Stew told the BBC in February that she feels like a single mother, even though she is happily married. She has been married to her Egyptian husband since 2016, but her young son had only seen him a few times. She blamed this on the spouse visa finance requirements, which she cannot meet. Because she is caring for her child, she can only work part-time as a sales assistant; her earnings, therefore, fall far short of the £18,600 per annum required to bring a foreign spouse into the UK.
Many cases like that of Mrs. Stew have been highlighted, especially following the Supreme Court on R (on the application of MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department in February. Many couples, migrant pressure groups, and the best immigration Solicitors, especially in London where many foreign nationals live, hoped that the seven learned judges who heard the case would overturn the Court of Appeal’s previous decision to uphold the minimum income threshold.
They were bitterly disappointed.
The minimum income threshold for the UK spouse visa
Since 2012, a UK settled person (i.e. who has British Citizenship or indefinite leave to remain), who wishes to sponsor a non-EEA spouse, civil partner, unmarried partner or fiancé to join them in the UK, must have a minimum salary of £18,600 per year and have had this level of income for six months or more. A further £3,800 is required for one dependent child and £2,400 for each additional child.
Prior to 2012, couples only had to prove they could support themselves without using public funds.
A couple’s savings can be considered, but any shortfall from the financial requirement threshold must be multiplied by 2.5 and added to the sum of £16,000.00.
In practice, if the sponsoring spouse has an annual gross income of £14,000, the shortfall of £4,600 must be multiplied by 2.5 (£11,500) then added to the ‘base’ amount of £16,000. Therefore, the couple would need to provide evidence of savings of a total of £27,600.
Solicitors who specialise in UK Spouse Visas can assist couples with working out the complicated saving shortfall formula.
How people are affected by the financial requirement of the UK spouse visa
The Home Office spouse visa financial requirements were brought in by Prime Minister, Theresa May, who at the time was Home Secretary. Mrs. May has long been determined to drastically curb immigration figures and targeting immigrant families wishing to come to the UK to join a partner or a parent, was one way to achieve this.
The UK spouse visa financial requirements have always been viewed as harsh. Research estimates that only 40% of settled UK people could meet the financial requirement set out by the Home Office for Spouse Visas.
In 2015, the Children’s Commissioner for England published a scathing report accusing the government of forcing up to 15,000 British children to grow up separated from a parent due to the harsh Home Office spouse visa financial requirements. The reported stated that Skype was the primary method of contact the children had with their parent.
Anne Longfield, Children’s Commissioner for England said:
“There is a wealth of evidence which indicates that children are far more likely to thrive when they are raised by parents in a warm, stable and loving family environment, and that is why I am a strong supporter of family-friendly policies.
“I am therefore very concerned that the immigration rules introduced in July 2012 actively drive families apart, and leave British children able to communicate with one parent only via Skype.
“Many of the children interviewed for this research suffer from stress and anxiety, affecting their well-being and development. It is also likely to have an impact on their educational attainment and outcomes because they have been separated from a parent, due to these inflexible rules which take little account of regional income levels or family support available.
“We are not talking about having unrestricted access, but we need to put the heart back into this policy and consider the profound impact the rules have on this group of British children and their families.”
The Children’s Commissioner made the following recommendations in the report to improve the situation for families:
- increase flexibility when calculating a family's income to reflect family support available and local wage levels
- inclusion of a requirement to consider the best interests of every child affected
- amendment to forms and guidance to ensure decision-makers properly consider children’s best interests in the decision-making process
- changes to the cost of applications and the application process
- grant of visit visas to parents of children living in the UK
- improvements to data collection and publication of applications.
The best immigration Solicitors and lobby groups agreed, leading to the significant case of R (on the application of MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department being heard in London’s Supreme Court.
The MM case was a long-awaited update on the law surrounding the financial requirement for UK Spouse Visas. Although the Supreme Court judges held that the financial requirement was not in breach of human rights and was acceptable “in principle,” it did go some way to support the Children’s Commissioner’s recommendations.
The judges held that the Home Office spouse visa financial requirements were inconsistent with the British government’s obligations under section 55 of the Borders, Citizenship and immigration Act 2009 and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. It directed that the immigration rules and guidance needed to be updated so immigration staff could give enough weight to the best interest of any children involved in cases where the UK spouse visa financial requirement should be applied. The court also held that failing to allow entry clearance officers to take any third-party funding into account when meeting the minimum income threshold also needed to be reviewed by the Home Office.
What you can do if you are applying for a UK spouse visa
The best way to increase your chances of having a visa application approved is to instruct an experienced immigration lawyer who understands Spouse Visas. A solicitor who is experienced in making applications for UK Spouse Visas may charge a fixed fee for the service in some cases, depending on the complexity of the matter.
The Government has currently made no further updates on the findings of the Supreme Court. Until it does, some families will be left in limbo. However, by instructing a well-connected, innovative immigration lawyer who understands the best way to complete a UK spouse visa application, you have a high chance of successfully reuniting your family.
OTS Solicitors is one of the most respected immigration law firms in London. Our immigration team dealing with UK family visas comprises of Smit Kumar, Hans Sok Appadu, and Maryem Ahmed, all of whom would be happy to talk to you about applying for a UK Spouse Visa and any questions you have on the minimum financial requirement.
By making an appointment with one of our immigration solicitors, you can be assured of receiving some of the best legal advice available in the UK today.
If you wish to discuss any of the points raised in this blog, please phone our London office on 0207 936 9960.
For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS immigration Solicitors on 020 7936 9960 or contact us online.
We are one of the UK’s top firms for immigration Solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, Spouse Visas, student visas, Work Permit Visas, indefinite leave to remain, EEA Applications, asylum and human rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, Entrepreneur Visas and Investor Visas.
Our top immigration Solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.
Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0207 936 9960.
By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.
Posted on: Thursday, 20 April, 2017