Tier 2 Cap damaging Britain’s High-Tech economy

The tech sector is the latest area of Britain's economy to be hit by the Tier 2 Cap imposed by the Home Office. The cap limits the number of skilled workers who can come to take up roles they have already been offered the UK using the Tier 2 business immigration route. The BBC has reported that over 1200 IT/Tech specialists who were offered roles were denied visas between December 2017 to March 2018. 

The Campaign for Science and Engineering (CASE) obtained the figures. The Chief Executive of CASE, Dr Sarah Main, commented in response

"The tragedy is that this policy doesn't work for anyone: the government, employers or the public" 

"The government repeats its mantra that Britain should be open to the brightest and the best, and yet this policy specifically rejects those people."

The Government is keen to say that Britain is ‘open for business’, specifically looking to develop the tech sector, and build a high-tech economy for the 21st Century and beyond. It seems clear to top immigration solicitors in London that the current immigration policy, and the Tier 2 cap, will hinder this significantly. Although the Government policy is designed to encourage business to recruit from the settled workforce first, the requirements of the Tier 2 visa process mean that employers will have had to advertise these roles in the UK first before recruiting overseas. The cap effectively prevents employers from filling roles that they cannot fill within the UK.

The latest figures from the Home Office indicate that in March 2018, the number of visa refusals topped 50% for the first time. Since December 2017, the monthly limit has been significantly exceeded every month, although March was the first time the number of refusals amounted to more than half the applications. In the previous years since the cap was introduced in 2012, it had only been exceeded once, in June 2015, when 66 visa applications for engineering roles were refused. Scientists and engineers have been hardest hit, with the cumulative total now standing at over 1800,  while over 1500 medical practitioners with roles to come to have been refused visas.

As some of the best immigration lawyers in London, the team at OTS Solicitors can advise your business on the process for obtaining a Tier 2 Sponsor Licence, enabling you to sponsor talent from overseas to come and work in your business, and can support individuals making an application for a Tier 2 visa. We are highly recommended in the Legal 500 for all aspects of business immigration law. Call 0203 959 9123 to book an appointment today whatever your business immigration issue.

 

Categories: 

Relevant People: 

For the best expert legal advice and outcome on your UK immigration application, contact OTS immigration solicitors on 0203 959 9123 or contact us online.

 

We are one of the UK’s top firms for immigration solicitors and civil liberties lawyers. We can advise on a broad range of immigration issues including Appeals and Refusals, Judicial Reviews, Spouse Visas, Student Visas, Work Permit Visas, Indefinite Leave to Remain, EEA Applications, Asylum and Human Rights, British Citizenship, All types of visas, Business Immigration Visas, Entrepreneur Visas and Investor Visas.

Our top immigration solicitors and lawyers are here to assist you.

 

Disclaimer: The information and comments on this page/site is made available free of charge and for educational and information purposes only. The information and comments do not amount to and are not intended to be adopted as legal advice to any individual or company. The use of this site should not be a substitute for specific legal advice, which we ask you to see our contact page or call our solicitors on 0203 959 9123.

By using this site you understand that there is no solicitor and client relationship between you/your company and the site owners or the firm. We make every effort to keep the published articles up-to-date and accurate, however the law changes very rapidly and the older the articles on this site, the more likely that the views in it have changed with the development of the law.